Manufacturing analysis: the framework
One of the most common questions a burgeoning food company must discern is whether to self-manufacture or enlist a contract manufacturer. This is a nuanced topic, and each product endeavor requires a tailored solution to provide the greatest chance of commercial success.
This framework can be used for a comparative analysis and will help drive consensus towards an actionable path forward.
Category | Contract manufacturing | Self-manufacturing |
Capital expense | Typically, it requires less upfront investment as you're not purchasing machinery or infrastructure. | Requires higher capital expenditure for machinery, infrastructure, and initial setup. |
Operational expense | No direct equipment maintenance costs. Pricing can be negotiated based on volume. | Ongoing operational, maintenance, and labor costs. |
Timing | Faster to market, with the critical path dependent on partner securement and supply chain activation | Facility securement, permitting, and infrastructure/process build-out introduce risk to the commercialization timeline. |
Quality control | Dependence on third parties for quality assurance. Potential inconsistency between batches. Need for strong quality agreements and regular audits. | Direct responsibility for quality processes. Real-time monitoring and adjustments are possible. Easier to implement changes or improvements. |
Flexibility and scalability | Faster scalability if the manufacturer has capacity. Less flexible for last-minute changes or customizations. | Flexibility in production adjustments. Scalability can be limited by infrastructure and requires capital investment. |
Supply chain | Potential for faster turnaround if the manufacturer has inventory or capacity. Reliance on third-party's supply chain. | Direct control over inventory and lead times. Entire supply chain management responsibility. |
Intellectual property [IP] and confidentiality | Risk of IP exposure. Need for strong confidentiality agreements. | Better control and protection of IP. No need to share proprietary information externally. |
Skills and expertise | Access to the manufacturer's specialized expertise and experience. Reduced need for in-house expertise. | Need for skilled labor and expertise. Opportunity to build and nurture in-house talent. |
Every food company must determine which model aligns best with their strategic goals, financial capabilities, and risk tolerance. Ultimately, the decision rests on a combination of factors. Evaluating each based on the company's unique situation is essential to making an informed decision.